您当前的位置:首页 >> 期刊正文

西藏和平解放前后《纽约时报》对中国西藏的报道探析?
[中文引用] [英文引用]
[HTML下载] [Word下载] [发表评论] [查看评论] [加入收藏][705人次已阅读该文]
程早霞 曲晓丽
摘要:

在西藏和平解放前后大约两年的时间里,美国《纽约时报》对中国西藏的报

道主要包括西藏和平解放的进程、西藏分裂势力的相关活动、联合国如何插手西藏事务、美

国关于西藏政策的变化以及印度、苏联的态度等内容。认真梳理《纽约时报》对中国西藏的

报道,可以看出冷战思维及西藏的地缘战略重要性是美国关注西藏局势发展的重要考量因素。

这一时期美国主流媒体对中国西藏报道内容的选择凸显了美国政府的政治取向,充满了冷战

色彩,报道反映了冷战时期美国西藏政策的历史性变化和美国对印度政策的具体行动目的,

严重混淆了国际视听。


Abstract:
关键词:美国 中国西藏 《纽约时报》 《十七条协议》
Keywords:
分类号:K27;D829.1
出版年·卷·期:2015·22·第3期
页码:
DOI:
参考文献:[1]中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室:《西藏发展道路的历史选择》,《人民日报》2015 年4 月16 日。[2] “ Communist Plan to Liberate Tibet”, The New York Times, Jan. 8, 1950, p.3.[3] “ Invasion of Tibet by Mao Held Near”, The New York Times, Jul. 23, 1950, p.14.[4] “ Reds Offer Tibet Autonomy”, The New York Times, Nov. 12, 1950, p.13.[5]Henry R. Lieberman,“ Lhasa Accepts the Suzerainty of Peiping in a 17-Point Pact”, The New York Times,May 28, 1951, p.1.[6] 梁相斌:《中西方新闻战》,新华出版社2008 年版,第44 页。[7] 宋月红:《西藏和平解放〈十七条协议〉谈判、签订问题研究》,《史学月刊》2008 年第2 期。[8]“ Invasion of Tibet”, The New York Times, Nov. 5, 1950, p.143.[9]“ The Curtain Falls in Tibet”, The New York Times, May 28, 1951, p.18.[10] Jay Walz,“ US May Grant Tibet Recognition in View of Current Asian Situation”, The New York Times,Oct.25, 1949, p.5.[11] Robert Trumbull,“ India Reconsiders Her Peiping Policy”, The New York Times, Oct .29, 1950, p.8.[12]《附件四件》,《人民日报》1950年11月17日;“ Text of Indian and Red China Notes on Tibet Invasion”,The New York Times, Nov. 3, 1950, p.6.[13] Robert Trumbull,“ Nehru Now Sees China in a Different Light”, The New York Times, Nov .5, 1950, p.147.[14] C.L.Sulzber,“ Soviet Seen Prodding Mao to Turn Army Southward”, The New York Times, Jan. 24, 1950, p.12.[15] Robert Trumbull,“ Soviet Maps Tibet Air Bases in Potential Threat to India”, The New York Times, Nov.22, 1950, p.1.[16] Robert Trumbull,“ Red Road to India on North Outlined”, The New York Times, Nov. 23, 1950, p.6.[17] 李希光:《畸变的媒体》,复旦大学出版社2003 年版,第203 页。[18]﹝ 美﹞爱德华 · S · 赫尔曼、诺姆 · 乔姆斯基著,邵红松译:《制造共识:大众传媒的政治经济学》,北京大学出版社2011 年版,第25 页。[19] 沈国麟:《控制沟通:美国政府的媒体宣传》,上海人民出版社2007 年版,第56~60 页。[20]“ The Tibetan Cabinet Ministers to the Secretary of State”, Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS),1949, Vol.IX, Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, pp.1087~1088.[21] 陈积敏:《中美围绕联合国“ 涉藏” 议案的外交斗争》,《外交评论》2010 年第2 期。[22]“ The Secretary of State to the Embassy in India”, FRUS, 1951, Vol. VII, pp.1693~1695.[23] Robert Trumbull,“ Dalai Lama Stays in Tibet Capital;Lhasa Stops Delegation to Peiping”, The New YorkTimes, Nov. 6, 1950, p.1.[24] Robert Trumbull,“ Armistice Appeal by Tibet to Red China is Reported”, The New York Times, Nov.14, 1950, p.1.[25]“ Dalai Lama Takes Full Power Today”, The New York Times, Nov. 17, 1950, p.6.[26]“ Dalai Lama Flees Tibet, Report Says”, The New York Times, Dec. 26, 1950, p.1.[27]“ Dalai Lama Reported Planning to Set up New Tibetan Capital Close to the Border”, The New York Times,Dec .30, 1950, p.2.[28]“ Dalai Lama Seeks Red China’s Terms”, The New York Times, Jan. 14, 1951, p.1.[29] A.Tom Grunfeld,“ Tibet’s Role in U.S.-China Relations”, The New York Times, Mar .23, 1988, p.A26.[30] John Kenneth Knaus,“ Official Policies and Covert Programs: The U.S. State Department, the CIA, and theTibetan Resistance”, Journal of Cold War Studies, Summer 2003, Vol.5, Issue 3.[31] Hollis S.Liao,“ The United States and Tibet in the 1940’s”, Issues & Studies, May 1990.[32] John Kenneth Knaus,“ An Uncertain Ally: The United States Government And Tibet”, Harvard AsiaQuarterly, Summer 2000.[33] The Ambassador in India (Henderson) to the Director of the Office of South Asian Affairs (Mathews),FRUS, 1951, Vol.XII, pp.1610~1612.[34]﹝ 美﹞梅 · 戈尔斯坦著、杜永彬译:《喇嘛王国的覆灭》,中国藏学出版社2005年版,第621~642页。[35] John Kenneth Knaus, Official Policies and Covert Programs: The U.S. State Department, the CIA, and theTibetan Resistance, Journal of Cold War Studies, Summer 2003, Vol.5, Issue3.[36]“ Tibet Calls on UN to Mediate Strife”, The New York Times, Nov. 11, 1950, p.11.[37] A.M. Rosenthall,‘ El Salvador Asks U.N. Tibet Debate’, The New York Times, Nov. 16, 1950, p.8.[38]“ El Salvador Refuses to Withdraw Demand for U.N. Assembly Debate on Tibet Invasion”, The New YorkTimes, Nov .17, 1950, p.6.[39] A.M.Rosenthall,“ U.N. Group Shelves Discussion of Tibet”, The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1950, p.3.[40]“ Cloak and Dagger in Tibet”, The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1950, p.10.[41] Robert Trumbull,“ India Now Swings Sharply to West”, The New York Times, Dec.10, 1950, p.1.

欢迎阅读《《当代中国史研究》》!您是该文第705位读者!