| “百万人委员会”与 1957 年美国对华贸易论战 ——以周以德档案为基础 |
| [中文引用] [英文引用] |
| [HTML下载] [Word下载] [发表评论] [查看评论] [加入收藏][375人次已阅读该文] |
| 刘禹辰 林孝庭 |
| 摘要： 围绕与新中国进行贸易的问题，从 1956 年底开始，美国舆论界发生了一次大 论战。一派以“百万人委员会”为首，反对对华贸易，主张不接触、不承认新中国；另一派 由部分宗教领袖、记者、学者、商人与政客组成，主张扩大对华贸易，与新中国积极来往。 “百万人委员会”从经济、道德、国家安全等多个角度发动舆论攻势，宣扬与新中国进行贸易 “百害而无一利”；支持对华贸易者的声音虽然弱小，但他们利用媒体针锋相对地进行论辩。 这场论战的结局是“百万人委员会”获得胜利，但是这场论战却是“百万人委员会”由盛转 衰及美国对华舆论与对华政策转向的肇始。 |
| Abstract： |
| 关键词：贸易论战 中美关系 “百万人委员会” 周以德档案 |
| Keywords： |
| 分类号：K27；D829 |
| 出版年·卷·期：2017·24·第4期 |
| 页码： |
| DOI： |
| 参考文献：［1］崔丕：《艾森豪威尔政府的东西方贸易管制政策》，《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》1999 年第 2 期。［2］林利民：《遏制中国：朝鲜战争与中美关系》，时事出版社 2000 年版，第 346 页。［3］袁小红：《公众舆论与美国对华政策（1949~1971）》，湖南大学出版社 2008 年版，第 208 页。［4］﹝美﹞罗斯·Y·凯恩著、张晓贝等译：《美国政治中的“院外援华集团”》，商务印书馆 1984 年版，第 12、41 页。［5］Letter to radio and television commentators, November 12, 1953, Box No. 176.7, China File, General/Non?printed Material, 1953~1954, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［6］Suggested letter to Business Managers of Newspapers in 68 selected cities, Box No. 176.7, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［7］The Committee of One Million, Box No. 176.8, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives,Stanford University.［8］Information Bulletin, 1955, Box No. 176.8, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, StanfordUniversity.［9］Stanley D. Bachrack, The Committee of One Million, China Lobby Politics, 1953~1971，New York:Columbia University Press, 1976, pp.127~128.［10］Telegram from the Embassy in the United Kingdom to the Department of State, October 31, 1955, ForeignRelations of the United States (FRUS), 1955~1957, Vol. X, p.266.［11］Pro-Peiping tie Drive Charged, The Sun, May 13, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, HooverInstitution Archives, Stanford University.［12］John K. Fairbanks,China: Time for a Policy, ANTLANTIC, April 1957. Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［13］Relations between the United States and Communist China, May, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［14］Debate over China Policy, TIME, June 10,1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover InstitutionArchives, Stanford University.［15］李继高：《“中国差别”的废除与英美关系（1955~1957）》，《中共党史研究》2016 年第 2 期。［16］Trade with China, Henry Gemmill, The Wall Street Journal, April 24, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［17］Richard Hughes,China Will Cut Tractor Imports: Farm Manpower Stays, The Sunday Times, June 9, 1957,Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［18］Come on In, the Water’s, N. Y. Herald Tribune, June 25, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers,Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［19］Red China Regime Admits Famine Peril, New York World-Telegram and Sun, May 13, 1957, Box No.177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［20］Greg Macgregor,Red China’s Army Combats Tension, New York Times, June 17, 1957. Box No. 177.1,Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［21］No China Trade, N. Y. Herald Tribune, May 26, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover“百万人委员会”与 1957 年美国对华贸易论战· 109 ·Institution Archives, Stanford University.［22］Greg Macgregor, Slave Labor Gets Big Peiping Role, New York Times, June 9, 1957. Box No. 177.1,Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［23］Dope: Communist China’s Role in the International Drug Traffic. Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers,Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［24］Trade with China Seen as Rescue of Peiping, N. Y. Herald Tribune, May 13,1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H.Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［25］David Lawrence, Britain’s Trade with China Seen Bringing on a War, N. Y. Herald Tribune, June 12, 1957,Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［26］Committee of 1000000 sees China Trade Peril, The Standard-Times, June 10, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H.Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［27］Red China Trade Termed Treason, New York World-Telegram and Sun, June 10, 1957, Box No. 177.1,Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［28］Group Warns, Trade with Peiping Perils All Free Men, New York Post, June 10, 1957, Box No. 177.1,Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［29］Red China Foes Warn of Trade with the Enemy, N. Y. Herald Tribune, June 10, 1957, Box No. 177.1,Walter H. Judd Papers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［30］Free World Ruin Seen in China Tie, Daily News, June 11, 1957, Box No. 177.1, Walter H. Judd Papers,Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［31］Group Here Backs Ban on China Trade, New York Times, June 11, 1957. Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［32］The Debate over Our China Policy, The New Republic, June 24, 1957. Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［33］Nathaniel Peffer, Do We Need Formosa? The New Republic, June 24, 1957. Box No. 177.1, Walter H. JuddPapers, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.［34］Our Polices towards Communism in China, June 28, 1957, FRUS, 1955~1957,China,Vol.III, pp.562~563.［35］ NSC5704/3, “Statement of U.S. Economic Defense Policy”, September 16, 1957, FRUS, 1955~1957,China,Vol. Ⅹ, pp.495~498.［36］沈志华、梁志主编：《窥视中国：美国情报机构眼中的红色对手》，东方出版中心 2011 年版，第2~3 页。［37］陶文钊主编：《中美关系史（1949~1972）》，中国社会科学出版社 2007 年版，第 355 页。 |
